About Me

Name: Warner Todd Huston
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

New York Mayor Personally Hires Illegals for City Work... Where is the Media?

-By Warner Todd Huston

Mayor George Darden, of Spring Valley, New York, is a Democrat who has been caught hiring illegal immigrants to work for his suburban village but you wouldn't know he is a Democrat by the coverage his story is getting. In fact, of the several stories thus far, not one even mentions his Party. But, an even bigger mystery is why this story isn't getting wider notice?

On the 17th this story of a Mayor of a New York city personally approaching illegal immigrants on street corners and hiring them to work for the village was first reported in local papers. It seems awfully shocking that an elected official would personally violate so many US immigration and work laws all at one time, yet no mention of the man's Party has surfaced nor have we heard much from this story on a national level. How much hype would this story get from the AP, do you imagine, if this Mayor had been a Republican? And why has several days gone by with so few MSM outlets picking this story up? Perhaps that this Mayor isn't a Republican the national media finds it less than compelling?

In any case, here is the meat of the thing:

Darden spoke after The Journal News reported that Felix Sandoval, an undocumented day laborer from Guatemala, identified Darden as the man who hired him and several friends for demolition work.

"He came on Sunday in his suit," Sandoval said. "He came and he said to me, 'Do you work?' ... He gave me a paper with how much he was going to pay us" _ $10 an hour.

Asked if he was sure it was Darden, Sandoval said yes and produced one of the mayor's business cards from his wallet, the report said. The Journal News had first reported on Tuesday that illegal immigrants had been hired by the village for the project.

Seriously, imagine if this was a Republican Mayor?

But he is not. He is a Democrat, not that this fact seems to make it into any of the stories.

The AP starts their coverage with no mention of the Mayor's Party, nor any mention throughout.
<blockquote>
SPRING VALLEY, N.Y. -- The mayor of a suburban village refused Thursday to address a report that he had personally recruited illegal immigrants for a public works project. He denied, however, that any such immigrants had been hired "intentionally and knowingly."
</blockquote>

The AP's short report doesn't mention Darden is a Democrat, either.

The New York Journal News has a few stories and none of them mention the Mayor's Party affiliation, granted they are a local paper and people would presumably already know this Mayor's Party.

Spring Valley hires undocumented workers for project

Dept. of Labor will look into Spring Valley's hiring of illegal immigrants

But, I have yet to see this story on a wider release. This one seems a naturally topical story about immigration, their illegal working, taxes... any number of topics relevant to one of today's hot button issues. But, so far, little to nothing is seen on a larger scale release.

Don't you wonder why that is?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Associated Press Says America has 'Faded' Since WWII

-By Warner Todd Huston

The AP will use just about any excuse to say that the USA isn't what it used to be, or what it should be. Yes, they will use any excuse to tear down this great country. Today's example is predicated on the dodgy research of another America bashing "economist" who is saying Americans are too short -- as in too short in actual, physical height -- because we are "gradually falling behind the rest of the world" in everything.

Lamenting that in the 1850's the people of the USA averaged 2 and 1/2 inches taller than folks in western Europe, the AP goes on to rip the USA because other nations have caught up to us and, in some cases, surpassed us in height. But it isn't just height that the AP says makes us losers.

Without explaining, the AP says that we have faded in "so many other arenas."

But just as it has in so many other arenas, America's predominance in height has faded. Americans reached a height plateau after World War II, gradually falling behind the rest of the world as it continued growing taller.

If we are such big losers, why are so many of the world's people <i>still</i> killing themselves to get here? Why are we considered the world's lone superpower? But, let's not allow reality to get in the way of the AP's getting a good hate on for the USA.

But, let's get to the claims of the man upon who's research the AP based their story. First of all he is not an American, which shouldn't surprise anyone.

...John Komlos, an economic historian at the University of Munich who was born in Hungary, grew up in Chicago, and has spent the last quarter century compiling data on the heights of nations.

His initial assumptions are certainly correct. A people grow taller as their health and wealth increase. That seems a no-brainer.

Many economists would argue that it does matter, because height is correlated with numerous measures of a population's well-being. Tall people are healthier, wealthier and live longer than short people. Some researchers have even suggested that tall people are more intelligent.

Now this is obvious. I hope no one paid this guy to state the obvious.

But, where he gets ridiculous is with his claims that the USA is somehow falling behind now. Sure in the 1850s the people of other countries were far shorter. That was because we were the healthiest, richest country on the planet! And, sure other countries have caught up to us now.

But here is the thing...

Over the last 150 years we HELPED our European counterparts (as well as everyone else in the world) get richer and healthier with our research, markets, exports, ideas, and democratic principles. The rest of the world didn't just catch up by happenstance, WE allowed them to as a result of the exportation of our excellence. If it weren't for the USA, they would still be wallowing in the poverty they were used to before the USA was created.

So, what this goof ball claims is our "falling behind" is really our generosity and excellence assisting the rest of the world to join us in health and wealth. And, what this story SHOULD have been was one praising the USA for letting the rest of the world become healthy and wealthy enough for catching up to us in height at long last.

But, no. What we get is the AP saying we are "falling behind" the rest of the world.

So much for gratitude!

But even more absurd is the obvious conclusion that immigrants from South of the Border has affected our height statistics. If the Dutch are the tallest, as the AP report claims, and we are no longer receiving as many immigrants from that area of the world, then we are naturally going to have relatively smaller height statistics.  And, let’s face it, we have far more people from Mexico added to our population than Dutch these days!

Couldn't this could be a possible explanation, too?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tammy Faye Bakker passes, is the MSM Attacking Her Still?

-By Warner Todd Huston

Upon the passing today of famed 1980’s televangelist Tammy Faye Bakker-Messner, it is easy to recall that the MSM loved to attack her as a “symbol” of all that is wrong with America.

Liberal MSMers of the past loved to portray the woman as the "very model of Reagan's Decade of Greed," but this news made me wonder how the media is reporting her passing, at least during this early morning time as the country wakes to the news.

Tammy Faye has been reviled for many years by the MSM, though recently seems to have gained a sort of kitschy popularity. So, I admit that I went in assuming that the MSM would unleash their worst comments on her passing and, as I set out to search the reports, I was thinking that the MSM would use her death as just another excuse to attack her in their prosaically common, mean-spirited fashion. But, I was surprised upon finding that most of these early reports have shied away from the "decade of greed" tagline to her life and have refrained form gauche personal attacks.

All except for the Associated Press, that is.

Even the New York Times didn't editorialize much about Bakker-Messner's life in their report. Neither did the L.A.Times. Both papers stuck closely to a rather straight forward reporting of her life and history, surprisingly enough.

I found but one MSM news source that used the occasion of her passing to get in a dig. Naturally, it was the AP that couldn't just report the facts and had to slip in an editorial comment.  Here is the AP doing so when even the L.A.Times and New York Times, two of the most notoriously leftist papers in the country, wouldn't do so.

The AP says of Bakker-Messner:

For many, the TV image of then-Mrs. Bakker forgiving husband Jim's infidelities, tears streaking her cheeks with mascara, became a symbol for the wages of greed and hypocrisy in 1980s America.

So, there is the first example on full display of the attack on Bakker-Messner as being representative of that "decade of greed" that we are used to.

Now, I don't imagine that the MSM's niceties for Tammy Faye will stay de rigeur for long as we have yet to see any editorials about her passing and her life. No MSM columnist or pundit has had a chance to belch out their "feelings" on the evangelist's life as of yet, so I don't expect the MSM to much longer treat her passing with respect.

But, surprisingly, so far there is little by way of attack.

Still, maybe the New York Times story referenced above holds the key to that reason.

Gay men came to embrace Ms. Messner as a camp figure, making her the subject of gender-bending look-alike contests. She embraced them as well. She began attending gay pride events, and in 1996, she became the co-host of a syndicated television talk show with Jim J. Bullock, an openly gay actor.

Maybe the Times and other MSM outlets have at last found a readership they don't want to offend by attacking one of their celebrities?

Maybe.

In any case, so far it is refreshing that they aren't all immediately piling on at her passing. Could the MSM have found a heart in their emaciated breasts after all this time?

I guess I wouldn't wanna bet on it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Arrogant Politician Says Our Taxes are His Money

-By Warner Todd Huston

Don "bridge to nowhere" Young (R, Alaska) shows his arrogance again by verbally attacking fellow Republicans who were questioning his latest grab for earmarked, pork spending cash.

Taking "strong exception" to the proposal by Scott Garrett (R, New Jersey) to strike Young's pork spending on educational programs for native Alaskan and Hawaiians, Young threatened to "bite back" at his opponents.

"You want my money, my money," Young stridently declared before warning conservatives that, "Those who bite me will be bitten back."

According to Politico.com, however, it was Garrett, not Young, who got the appreciation of Republican colleagues.

Members of the conservative Republican Study Committee gave Garrett a standing ovation later in the day during the group's weekly meeting, an aide to one conservative member said.

And this had better be the case. Young is one of the worst offenders of pork spending in the Congress. As Politico reminds us...

And lest we forget, Young, who used to chair the House Transportation Committee, is responsible for the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere," a proposed span connecting Ketchikan, Alaska, with the tiny island of Gravina that would have cost $315 million – and eventually came to symbolize profligate spending under Republican rule.

Oh, and he has spent more than $250,000 on legal fees so far this year at the same time that federal investigators probe some of his campaign's biggest contributors.

Young, with his wasteful spending and bloated budget busting, is the poster child for why Republican and moderate voters turned away from the GOP in the 2006 midterms. His sort of arrogance is the kind that makes people wonder why they shouldn't just vote for a real Democrat if their Republican guy in office is going to act like one anyway.

This guy is the worst kind of Republican.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MSM Highlight GOP 'Defections', Ignore Dems Voting Against Their Own

-By Warner Todd Huston

We are seeing all over the MSM the reports highlighting the Republicans in the House and Senate who are turning away from the Party line and voting against -- or at least seeming to vote against -- the President's Iraq war policies. The MSM is presenting this revolt as a momentous thing, unprecedented and presenting it as a loss for the President's ideas. Yet, even as a small number of Republicans have, indeed, voted against the Party line, an even larger number of Democrats are voting against their Party, too. Yet, somehow, we are not hearing this being brought up by the tongue waggers and controversy-mongers in the MSM.

In a July 12th vote in the House of Representatives to mandate a certain date to pull out of Iraq, for instance, the fact that four Republicans broke ranks is treated as a stampede of GOP defectors. Yet, in that same vote, 10 Democrats did not vote with their Party -- in effect "defecting" to the GOP side of the argument. Of this fact, the MSM seem strangely quite.

Why is it that four Republican votes against the President's plans is some sort of landslide, yet 10 Democrat votes against their Party line is ignored?

Here are just a few reports that take pains to highlight the GOP defectors and either never mention the Democrat votes, or they do not much focus on them.

Reuters) REPUBLICANS BREAKING RANKS
The White House report is being sent to Congress after several prominent Republicans have broken ranks with Bush on Iraq, adding momentum to Democratic-led efforts to try to force a scaling-back of troop levels more than four years after the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

New York Times
For now, at least, Mr. Bush has rejected the advice of those who have urged him to hint at a timeline for withdrawal, concluding that to follow that course would only have emboldened Republican rebels and others in Congress to go even further in trying to reshape his strategy.

The San Francisco Chronicle
(San Francisco Chronicle) Republican congressional support for President Bush's Iraq war policy may be splintering, but enough GOP senators remained united with the president Wednesday to sidetrack legislation that would have made it harder to return military units to the war zone.

About the only more in depth story I could find that gives the actual vote totals, was on on the AP.

House OKs Plan to Withdraw US Troops
The vote generally followed party lines: 219 Democrats and four Republicans in favor, and 191 Republicans and 10 Democrats opposed.

But, this is the only mention I have seen of the Democrat votes against their Party being so much higher than the GOP "defectors" votes.

So, once again, we have the troubles of the GOP spotlighted as if nothing like this has ever happened, yet the even larger Democrat "defectors" is ignored as not worthy of discussion!

Once again we see the MSM at work, folks. At work smoothing the waters for the Democrat Party.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sun-Times Writer 'harassed by Irate Republicans' Over 'Staunch Republican' for Dems Story

-By Warner Todd Huston

Jennifer Hunter, the Chicago Sun-Times writer and wife of Sun-Times publisher John Cruickshank, who wrote the recent story  I skewered a few days ago revealing a supposed "staunch Republican" from Philly who has suddenly decided to support the Democrats in 2008, has written a new piece today claiming she is being "harassed by a group of irate Republicans" because of her badly researched column. (The interviewee in her piece claimed to be a "staunch Republican" even as his cash donation records prove he almost exclusively supports Democrats) Her follow up, however, seems more like the kid caught with her hand in the cookie jar while blaming everyone around her as opposed to a satisfactory explanation of a failure to fully investigate her story.

Complaining... no, more like whining... that she has been flooded with "daily emails" calling her a liar and demanding that she be fired, Hunter-Cruickshank blames the headline writers instead of her own poor investigative work for the firestorm of criticism.

The grumbling arose partially because my editor took a small part of my story and made it into a headline: "GOP lawyer sold on Dems." Reporters don't write headlines, editors do. And they want to write something catchy so readers will read the darned story.

Certainly it is true that MSM columnists do not write their own headlines. But, it isn't the headline that is misleading it is her story and her failure to investigate the claims of her subject. Who can blame the headline writer for coming up with that headline, anyway? After one reads her original story, it seems the natural fit!

Her next obfuscation is a complaint that everyone is ignoring the actual thrust of her piece.

The story was not about the GOP lawyer; it was about the speeches five Democratic presidential candidates gave to a convention of trial lawyers (those two words "trial lawyers" also make Republicans crazy) last Sunday. As reporters usually do, I asked two attendees after the session what they thought about the speeches.

This claim is a bit disingenuous of her. Of the 17 paragraphs/sentences of her original story, 7 of them were about Ronca and his trial lawyer pals. That is close to half the story. Further, the piece started and ended with Ronca's comments while the comments of the Candidates fills the middle. This story easily reads as a story about Ronca's reaction to the candidate's statements as opposed to one focusing more on the candidate's comments.

But, this is the best line of her lamentation:

One of the men I interviewed, Jim Ronca, identified himself as a disgruntled Republican, fed up with the Bush White House, who was going to give his vote and money to Democrats. In my story I called him a "staunch Republican." His wife was standing by his side, and so was a friend, a Democrat from New York, Ted Oshman, neither of whom disputed Ronca's description of himself as a Republican.

Ah, I see. So, Ronca told her so, eh? She didn't need to do any checking, see, 'cuz the guy told her so. There. Problem solved.

So, Hunter's next story will be... "Mr. bin Ladden told me he is innocent and that he really loves puppies, Christians and a good Hollywood movie, and that he just doesn't understand why everyone is out to get him?" After all, Hunter was told it was true!

So, now all we have to do to be considered a "reporter" is to merely write what we are told and, viola... we have "news."

What happened to verifying facts, investigating a bit, eh?

She also tries to explain away Ronca's lack of supporting past GOP candidates with his financial donations but does not do a very satisfactory job.

Industrious partisans, upset that anyone calling himself a Republican could possibly think of supporting the Democrats, decided to "investigate" Ronca, an attorney from Philadelphia. And what they found, they told me, was a long history of Ronca giving more money to Democrats than Republicans. (In fact, much of the money he donated to Democrats was after George W. Bush was elected.)

Well, according to the public record, Ronca began to donate cash to Democrats in 1994. By my calendar, that is just a few years BEFORE Bush got into the White House, Mrs. Hunter-Cruickshank. Your protest rings a bit hollow there, doesn’t it?

Additionally, it is amusing that she calls <i>us</i> the "industrious partisans" here. After all, to belie the claim that it is she, rather than we, who is the partisan, she could easily have found some Democrats that are supporting Republican candidates this time around. You know, to prove she is unpartisan?

But, no. Instead of trying that, she finds even <i>more</i> people who claim to be Republicans but are supporting Democrats, making her ever the poster child for Democrats who want to further partisan ends.

Hunter ended her rambling piece detailing the less than sparkling grammar of some "Republican" emails she received taking her to task. She gives us these somewhat rudimentary (and rude) messages to make us think, I suppose, that all Republicans are of sub par intelligence. It is, of course, a straw man argument she makes, one that proves nothing.

Hunter should see some of the Democrat emails I get. The intemperance and vulgarity, not to mention the hate, in them would curl her hair. If one could write an email with a child’s fat crayon, some of the ones I get would surely be so created!

Anyway, when you get to the end of her piece, you realize that her explanation for presenting a man who has but rarely donated campaign funds to a Republican as a "staunch Republican" is ONLY that he told her so.

Her failure at incredulity makes her nothing if not credulous.

I do have to say, though, as lame an attempt as it is, her need to answer to her critics makes me realize how powerful we really are out here. We have once again forced a member of the MSM to try and justify their lack of ethics and professionalism.

I do have one final question, though. How does a writer based in Chicago get access to, or even alerted to, a "staunch Republican" in Philadelphia who wants to advertise that he is supporting the Democrats, anyway? Did a little birdie whisper Jim Ronca's name into Hunter's ear at some point?

Just wondering.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Proof that French Government Workers have no Brains...

This one almost speaks for itself...

Tiny brain no obstacle to French civil servant

Scans of the 44-year-old man's brain showed that a huge fluid-filled chamber called a ventricle took up most of the room in his skull, leaving little more than a thin sheet of actual brain tissue.

"He was a married father of two children, and worked as a civil servant," Dr. Lionel Feuillet and colleagues at the Universite de la Mediterranee in Marseille wrote in a letter to the Lancet medical journal.

French Civil Service - Geniuses need not apply.

Ok, ok. It was a funny story. But, I have to step back and say one serious thing about it. This story does prove that the human body can do amazing things to make up for serious short comings.

As one of those interviewed for the Reuters story on this amazing Frenchman's case said:

"If something happens very slowly over quite some time, maybe over decades, the different parts of the brain take up functions that would normally be done by the part that is pushed to the side..."

Amazingly, this man was able to lead a pretty normal life. He had a job, got married, had kids, yet he functioned with only a tiny percentage of the brain matter that the normal human exists with.

He is the sort of human that an abortion advocate would have murdered in his infancy. Yet, left to his own he was able to thrive and have a very fulfilling life.

So much for an "unviable clump of cells", eh?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NYTimes Wants us to Feel Sorry for an Illegal Immigrant's Deportation

-By Warner Todd Huston

Last week, the New York Times ran an article feeling sorry for an illegal immigrant turned immigrant's "rights" activist who was discovered by a random immigration check on an Amtrak train and subsequently slated to be deported back to Chile, his homeland. The Times tried to massage readers into feeling bad for the man because he had been here since 1984 when he illegally crossed the Mexico/US border -- apparently the Times imagines that time bestows legality as opposed to obeying laws serving that purpose.

An axiom has resonated throughout the country that the NYT doesn't seem to grasp; "What part of illegal don't you understand?"

The Times sets up their story presenting their subject, Victor Toro, as some sort of pillar of the community. He has "meetings" and does community work for battered women. He has battled the government for immigrant's "rights." He's an all around important sort of fellow, you see.

Since the late 1980's, Toro has involved himself openly in many causes.

Mr. Toro and Ms. Ayress, both political activists, started Vamos a la Peña del Bronx in 1987, a storefront group that provided clothing and food for poor people, help with immigrants’ problems, shelter for battered women and health education for those who were H.I.V. positive.

In 1998, the group won an award and a $50,000 grant from Union Square Awards in Manhattan for community service. “We were looking for groups that were operating on pure passion but who had no economic resources,” said Iris Morales, director of the philanthropy.

All commendable activities, generally.

And here is the Time's excuse for being allowed to stay, ostensibly.

During more than two decades in the public eye, Mr. Toro was hiding his immigration status in plain sight, his lawyer said. Mr. Toro was arrested three times in the 1990s for nonviolent offenses: once for a political demonstration, a second time for a noise complaint, and a third for a building permit dispute.

Mr. Toro was never asked about his immigration status after his arrests, Mr. Moreno said. In addition, his home is opposite the 40th Precinct police station.

Unfortunately for him, though, he is still an illegal alien. One who scoffs at our laws. So, why should we feel so bad for him? He knew he was here illegally and, just because the nitwits and multicultralists in New York City never had the guts to bust him on it, doesn't mean he should be let off for his violation of the law. A crime is still a crime no matter how much time has passed since its commission.

The most offensive part of the NYT article on this lawbreaker, though, is the Times' attempt to equate US immigration laws to the despotic regime of Augusto Pinochet in Chile.

For Mr. Toro, 65, interactions with governments are filled with dread. When he was a left-wing political activist, General Pinochet’s regime tortured him after the coup that toppled Salvador Allende on Sept. 11, 1973, he said.

So, he was tortured in Chile -- a terrible thing to be sure -- but in all the many decades he has been here he has neither applied for citizenship, nor applied for political asylum it must be pointed out. Yet because he had a "dread" of the 1970s government of Agusto Pinochet, we should suspend our own laws just for him? And we should get all weepy about his status, something he never bothered himself with much in over 20 years?

I'd venture that if he has spent over 20 years here and has yet to learn that there is a monumental difference between the totalitarian government of Agusto Pinochet and that of the USA, then he is the sort of citizen that we don't really want anyway!

Perhaps the Times is right that Toro is a good candidate for political asylum, but why exactly should we get too upset if even Toro himself didn't take our laws seriously enough to be bothered with them? I, for one, cannot force myself to get all weepy over this man.

But, I'd bet Agusto Pinochet wouldn't have been so easy on him!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chgo Sun-Times: Turning Big Dem Contributor into 'Staunch Republican'

-By Warner Todd Huston

Why is it that every time the MSM writes a story about a supposedly "staunch Republican" who is vocally supporting the opposing Party, we have to wonder of its veracity? Maybe it's because there always seems to be a few little problems with the claim of "staunchness" on the part of the MSM's favored Party hopper du jour? And in this case, the Chicago Sun-Times story titled "GOP lawyer sold on Dems" by Jennifer Hunter, we have no better assurances than we ever do that the claimed "staunch Republican" is either very "staunch" or very "Republican."

Sun-Times writer Hunter dug up a supposedly "staunch Republican" named Jim Ronca, a trial lawyer from Pennsylvania. Mr. Ronca, claims Hunter, is "certain of one thing: He is not going to vote Republican in the 2008 presidential election."

But there is more than that. He also says he'll financially support Democrats, and he makes this announcement as if this is somehow an earth shattering rebuke to the GOP, or so the Sun-Times wishes us to believe.

"I'm not only going to vote Democratic, I'm going to financially support the Democrats," Ronca said after a luncheon forum of the American Association for Justice, featuring Gov. Bill Richardson, Sen. Barack Obama, former Sen. John Edwards, Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Joe Biden. "The Republicans in Washington are an embarrassment."

Well.... he told them, eh?

So this "staunch Republican" is now going to financially support the Democrats? This seems an about face for a Republican, doesn't it?

Unfortunately for the Sun-Times' attempt to make Ronca seem the dyed-in-the-wool Republican, Mr. Ronca has a long, long history of being a Republican who financially supports Democrats. In fact, a quick review of his public donation record proves that he almost never gives to a Republican at all. Out of the 10 candidates he's donated to, only two of them were Republicans... and one of those was Arlen Spector who hardly counts as a Republican in the first place! (One of the candidates he donated to I could not quickly identify the party affiliation. If anyone knows what party Bruce Bradley was in I'd appreciate the info.)

Some "staunch Republican" Ronca turns out to be!

Here are some of his political donations:

James R. Ronca
Schmidt, Ronca and Kramer

$1,000 Harris Wofford (Democrat, PA) 6/22/1994
$250 Charles Oberly (Democrat, PA) 10/3/1994
$500 Edward Kennedy (Democrat, MA) 11/16/1995
$250 Stewart Greenleaf (Republican, PA) 12/29/1999
$250 Patrick Casey (Democrat, PA) 6/3/2000
$500 Ron Klink (Democrat, PA) 6/13/2000
$500 Ron Klink (Democrat, PA) 9/15/2000
$500 Arlen Specter (Republican, PA) 11/5/2001
$500 Allyson Schwartz (Democrat, PA) 3/30/2004
$2,000 John Kerry (Democrat, MA) 5/27/2004
$500 Allyson Schwartz (Democrat, PA) 8/23/2005
$1,000 Bob Casey (Democrat, PA) 9/13/2006
$500 Bob Casey (Democrat, PA) 9/30/2005
$500 Bruce Bradley (?) 9/5/2006

Wow, thousands to Democrats, and pennies to the GOP. You know, the Party he is supposed to be a "staunch" member of?

Now, one might say that since Rona is a lawyer in Pennsylvania, he would have to support quite a few Democrats. After all, he is surrounded by them in Harrisburg and Philadelphia, right? All right, that might be a fair question. But that does not answer to why he has donated to a Massachusetts leftist (Teddy Kennedy) and supported the horribly leftist presidential candidate for the 2004 presidential election (John Kerry)? Maybe his support of local Democrats can be explained away, but not his support for lions of the left outside his state.

How many "staunch Republicans" do YOU know who would donate to Teddy Kennedy? I'd lay odds that such a creature is far and few between.

So, the claims that Jim Ronca is a "staunch Republican" doesn't hold much water and neither does the Sun-Times' story!

My last question is also a curiosity. We see these stories of so-called Republicans who are jumping ship to support the Dems all the time. Why is it that the MSM never sees fit to publish a story where Dems are jumping ship to go with the GOP? Did they get so discouraged with the Reagan Democrat that they vowed never to write such a story again?

It would seem so.

Update

I have found out that there was a misspelling on the one candidate that I could not identify. His name is Bruce Braley, not Bradley. "He's a Democrat who won election to Iowa's 1st Congressional District in 2006, replacing a Republican who retired to run for another office."

This means, and I quote a reply on one of my other web outlets... "that this 'staunch Republican' gave $8000 to Dems, as opposed to $750 for Republicans. I don't know of many staunch partisans who give money in a 10:1 ratio to the *other* party."

Yeah. Ronca is SOME "staunch Republican," indeed!

Update #2

I want to mention that John Hinderaker of Powerline blog, one of the top visited conservative blogs on the Internet, linked this story as it was posted by the author on Men's News Daily. Thanks for the link, Powerline!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Professing the "Faith" of Musli-Piscopalianism?

-By Warner Todd Huston

Janet Tu, religion reporter for the Seattle Times, recently came out with a mind-boggling story. She chronicles the odd pronouncement of the Reverend Ann Holmes Redding, an Episcopalian priest from Seattle, who has decided that she is both an Episcopalian and a Muslim.

Incongruously, Redding who is the director of faith formation at St. Mark's Episcopal Cathedral, a priest for more than 20 years Tu reports, is "ready to tell people that, for the last 15 months, she's also been a Muslim -- drawn to the faith after an introduction to Islamic prayers left her profoundly moved."

This is yet another outrage against the Episcopal Church, as hard as it is to rise to the level of outrage for a Church with so many such instances constantly coming to the fore. After all, the Episcopal Church has lurched from one upheaval to another for these many years. From the fight over ordaining female priests, to allowing avowedly and unapologetically homosexual priests to take the pulpit, not to mention their many decades of "progressive" ministries, the Episcopal Church has seen falling numbers in their congregations and splinters over doctrine as a result of the constant reevaluating of its tenets and practices. It's no wonder that the joke about them seems too true for comfort; Episcopalians are just agnostics who can't shake that need to go somewhere on a Sunday morning.

This latest instance does not help belie the claims from another, more cynical, religious perspective, that of radical Islamists, who claim the west in general is in relative cultural and religious decay. Islamists see endemic in western societies an unwillingness or inability to uphold their own religious convictions and sees a west constantly warping and tearing down their own practices. Certainly I won't substantiate that view, but it sure is hard to dismiss it out of hand when stories like this come up.

It is patently absurd, of course, to be both a Muslim and an Episcopalian, even for the gruel thin creed that is Episcopalianism. Not because being Episcopalian is so incompatible with Islam, but because Islam is entirely intolerant of any other religion and is, therefore, entirely incompatible with Episcopalians.

Islam sanctions lying to outsiders, oppressively taxing them for their beliefs, and, in some instances, the outright murder of those outside Mohammedan faiths, so to imagine that Islam would welcome a person professing two religions as if they were merely taking a half-hearted citizenship in two different countries is a fool's assumption. This confused Musli-piscopalian is deluding herself to imagine she can mix and match her religions like one might accessorize a summer dress -- especially when one of those religions is Islam.

Certainly, this paean to "tolerance", this kitschy religionism, is based in woeful ignorance of her original religion and willful ignorance of her newfound Islamic hobbyhorse. Of course, none of this would be so bad if religion was only meant to make one "feel" better like any new agie snake oil-like con job, but this is not the case at all. Religion is presented as God's truth, a truth not invented by man but one merely accepted by him. To mix and match them so gratuitously certainly makes the lie to any claims of "truth", to be sure.

This lack of doctrinal adherence is not surprising in the US in particular. Since the Second Great Awakening in the 1940's and 50's, doctrine went the way of the dinosaurs to be replaced by that religious "feeling" and the last vestiges of a Priests or Ministers who actually taught a religion was replaced by the showmen who made worshippers "feel" Jesus instead of understanding him and his teachings. So, it isn't surprising to find a woman who has such a lack of grounding in her religion that one seems just as good a fit as another... or that several can be molded and shaped to fit her "feelings" of the moment.

And here we get back to that disdain radical Muslims have for westerners; the fact that we won't even stand up for our own religious beliefs.

Let's be honest about something, shall we? No religion views any other religion as the "right" path to God. But, after thousands of years of violent intolerance, westerners were finally led by Britain and the United States to a level of tolerance of other religions, sanctioned and codified by law, that had never before existed. This is a reformation of thought that has never occurred in Islam and one that must occur for Islam to join the world's great religions as a force for good instead of evil.

Unfortunately, this Musli-piscoplianism invented by this wayward "Reverend" who is probably seeking the light of the media to lead her onward as opposed to that of God’s won’t help Islam to reform. That must be done from within Islam itself. All this woman's actions will do is heap more scorn on western religionists. And this woman is truly treating religion as an "ist" would be defined it should be stressed. Combining all sorts of religions to create something simply for the sake of a new religion of tolerance is not religion but "religionism" -- religion for the sake of religion, not religion as distinct ideologies and creeds.

But, maybe Episcopalians are not too far gone down the road of kitsch just yet. Janet Tu, the writer who broke this ridiculous story, later informed us in a separate story that the Reverend Ann Holmes Redding is being sidelined from her position as director of faith formation at St. Mark's Episcopal Cathedral by her Bishop, Rt. Rev. Geralyn Wolf. He has given her a year off from her duties to, "reflect on the doctrines of the Christian faith, her vocation as a priest, and what I see as the conflicts inherent in professing both Christianity and Islam."

Being both a Muslim and an Episcopalian seems too much even for the newagies in the Episcopalian Church thus far. Maybe there's hope yet that we in the west aren't ready to abandon all vestiges of our religious convictions?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When Even The Teachers Know Nothing

-By Warner Todd Huston

A short column by Ray Mcallister of the Richmond Times-Dispatch scolded a Virginia Middle School for having a drawing of Karl Marx on their graduation certificate. The school replied that they had thought that the drawing represented Frederick Douglas and didn't realize they had been using a picture of Karl Marx.

As Mcallister reports:

Richmond schools spokeswoman Felicia Cosby called last night to explain:

"She really thought she was capturing clip art representing Frederick Douglass. She did a search to pull up Frederick Douglass and this is what came up... with the beard and the hair."

It was all just a big mistake, you see?

OK. Maybe it was. Maybe this uninformed school teacher who helped design the graduation certificate didn't know what Frederick Douglass looked like and mistook the Marx image for Douglass'. She just didn't know.

But, if it was a mistake born from a lack of knowledge, does this make it all better? Can we just go on and forget about it? Is there no deeper meaning here?

I say a mistake is one thing, but this whole incident reveals that not only did this uninformed teacher not know what she was doing, but neither did the rest of the school's design committee, the school board, or even the printer who printed the thing.

In fact, these days you really don't have to have that much knowledge of either Karl Marx or Frederick Douglass to be able to easily discern the difference between their visages nor to find as many images of either as you want. The Internet is widely available, in case they didn't know.

But, here is the worst of it. Binford Middle School, with a 91.5% black enrollment, is an inner city, Richmond, VA school, and for a teacher of such a school not to even know what Frederick Douglass, arguably one of America's greatest black citizens, even looks like is a monumental failure of education. Not just education of the children but of the teacher.

One would think that a teacher in a solidly black school district would be so entirely familiar with Frederick Douglass that no such mistake could occur in the first place. But, what is painfully obvious here is that this teacher had no real knowledge of the man. She must have had some vague feeling that Douglass, one of America's most tireless anti-slavery men and confidant to Abraham Lincoln, might be a neat addition to the certificate because she sort of heard his name in connection with black history at some point, but otherwise she had no knowledge of the man at all. So, she finds some picture that vaguely reminds her of what she imagines this man to look like and she is satisfied.

But, the photo she finds is of Karl Marx, a man who spawned one of the most murderous ideologies ever created by the mind of man, a man who should be held in utter disregard as a blackguard and fool, a man who should be reviled by all.

Now, coincidentally, I recently wrote how Richmonders are forgetting their history by allowing the Confederate graves in Oakwood cemetery fall into disrepair. I scolded the Mayor of Richmond for forsaking his city's history. Granted this was an appeal to a black Mayor not to let the city's "white" history to be forgotten. (Though history is for all, this was, indeed, a "Confederate" issue, admittedly)

But, here we have another sad example of Richmonders losing touch with their history. And this time it is Richmond's blacks forgetting their <i>own</i> history. Can we excuse blacks for not caring much about Confederate history? Not really, though at least there is an understandable reason for such a slight. Can we excuse Richmond's blacks for not knowing black history?

Not a chance.

Especially in a day when it is assured that growing up themselves they were never even taught any "white" history in their own schooling in the first place! So the complete lack of knowledge about Frederick Douglass here is unforgivable.

I do want to be clear though. This is no attack only on blacks. This whole country is forgetting its history and it is a crime. This "mistake" of imagining that a Karl Marx image is that of Frederick Douglass is just another example of that failure of our educational establishment to teach our history.

Oh, but for a nation wide experiment in vouchers and an end to the state run public school.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Europe's 'Immigrant Problems' Close to Boiling Point

-By Warner Todd Huston

Islamofascism is fast over taking the immigrant communities of old Europe. Now, by "immigrant community" Europeans mean Muslim immigrants, of course. Whether they be Moroccans, or Africans or what have you, large segments of Europe's immigrants are from Muslim countries and these insular communities are long past the point of being merely troublesome already having become an outright danger. It has been a long time coming, but some Europeans are finally getting to the point of having had enough. More and more are finally beginning to speak out. But Europe’s empty PC attitudes and platitudes are hard in dying.

We are all aware of the on going riots and mass car burnings in France, but what many Americans ate not aware of is the increasing violence and sexual abuse that is occurring amongst Europe's most Islamicized immigrant communities. From Sweden, to Germany to the Netherlands, all across old Europe the danger, crime and poverty of their Muslim immigrant communities is growing exponentially every year.

I have written before of how England has seen an growing rise in sexual assaults and in the so-called honor killing, a brutal and barbaric practice where members of a girl's own family will kill her if she is even seen in public with the "wrong" kind of man. But, England is by no means an isolated trouble spot. All of Europe is seeing the same thing.

Many in Europe are finally starting to wake up and see the threat that Islam presents a civilized society, but they are still too few and not able to sway policy to any great extent... yet.

As reported in the Brussels Journal, tempers are reaching a boiling point.

In March this year, native Dutch residents of the city of Utrecht rioted to protest against harassment by Muslim youths and government inaction to stop this. The authorities immediately suppressed the riots by sealing off the area and installing surveillance cameras to control Dutch non-Muslims, but they have done virtually nothing to address the underlying problem of Muslim violence. And this is far from unique to the Netherlands.

But, as you can see, Europe's weakling governments are not ready to listen to the cries of their oppressed and abused peoples. This, of course, is not uncommon for Europe.

Sweden experienced a quadrupling in the number of rape charges in the space of a single generation. Yet Sweden's largest newspaper Aftonbladet recently indicated that the spike in rape numbers was due to the "warm weather," which would presumably mean that these rapes are caused by global warming. The fact that many of the suspects have a Muslim background is purely coincidental, no doubt.

Humor is often used when the soul aches, but the sad thing is, the joke about global warming is probably a real belief by too many over there. The Journal is laughing through its pain, I am sure.

But pain is not debilitating and sometimes alerts us to danger sooner than our minds can grasp the truth of the situation.

I hear some observers say that the political elites in Western Europe are "powerless" to stop Jihad street violence. But they are extremely aggressive in suppressing criticism of continued Muslim immigration, which indicates that they are not powerless, they are actively hostile to native non-Muslims. It's time Europeans realize that, and act accordingly.

No, not every European is a spineless, self-flagellating pantywaste. Some truly do see the danger they face and wish to do something about it.

Their day is fast arriving to be able to address these evils, too. These violent, sexual predators who perpetrate their crimes in the name of the "religion of peace" are sponsoring ever-increasing incidents and constantly rising statistics and the people of Europe will not long be able to turn their faces from the truth that confronts them every day. They will not be able to long pretend that their "tolerance" will keep their wives and daughters safe on the streets of their once great cities.

Sadly, many thousands of Europe’s young women will be raped or killed and many thousands more of Europe's children will be abused by these monsters that masquerade as religious adherents before the whole of the populace of Europe's various states wake up and take responsibility for their safety.

But here was a good sign in the report:

Meanwhile the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA) tries to silence Ehsan Jami, a Muslim apostate who is a local Labour politician in Leidschendam-Voorburg. The 22-year-old Jami intends to establish an international organization of ex-Muslims. An internal memo [pdf], sent to Labour parliamentarians and ministers, shows that the party fears that Jami’s campaign will cause it electoral damage and enrage Muslims. The party wants Jami to consider the fact that his initiative will go down badly with the PvdA’s immigrant following. The Dutch press revealed that Jami received hate mail from PvdA executives.

Let us all wish Eshan Jami the best of luck as we caution him to constantly look over his shoulder. The promulgators of the "religion of peace" won't take kindly to his attempts to stop them from their sexual predation.

And let us hope there are many more Europeans just like him coming to the fore and saying, finally, ENOUGH.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More like Religious ILLiteracy!

-By Warner Todd Huston

- A review of the new book by Stephen Prothero, Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know -- and Doesn't, Harper Collins, 2007, $24.95

Stephen Prothero should be hailed as the great "setter-righter" where it concerns truly how religious Americans are or aren't. It is true, of course, that Americans are generally the more religious of the current great western nations, but the assumption that Americans know much about their religions or even how to BE religious is one that Prothero dispels quite well. He shows us that our actual knowledge of what our own religions really are, what they mean, what their history is and how they differ one from the other is being lost with time. He successfully proves that America is a religious country with little religious knowledge and that our claims at being religious ring a bit hollow.

The best thing about Prothero's revelation is that he chronicles that our loss of religious knowledge didn't just happen with the beginning of the counterculture in the 1960's, but that it began to happen well before the Civil War in the 1800's. According to Prothero, it is a result of our own democratic propensities, but regardless of why it has happened, we must take steps to stop it.

The history that Prothero brings us is illuminative and important for every American to understand.

The history of American religiosity (or irreligiousness as the case may be), though, isn't the only subject of this fine book. The last section deals with how we can rectify the slow drift into religious amnesia by bringing a sensible study of religion back into our schools. Prothero rightfully points out that neither the Constitution nor the Supreme Court has outlawed the teaching of religion in our schools, but only the proselytizing of it. He also rightfully reminds us that our literature, our politics and our history is so closely tied with Christianity that to excise that one aspect of our history gives short shrift to the education we are giving our children and makes of them students unable to truly understand our own society.

Because of the extremists of the "separation of church and state" crowd, we have made our history undecipherable to too many. Prothero is correct in that we must reintroduce the religious aspect o our own history into the classroom to produce well rounded and informed students. He is also right that teaching about religion does not equate to promulgating particular religious tenets but only sets western history in context.

Lastly, this book has a handy, if not somewhat simplified, dictionary of important religious terms and concepts. Prothero hopes that the reader will benefit from some of these terms and bring their own religious literacy up a few notches by reading them. It'll be a good bet that many will be unfamiliar with some of these terms and concepts, especially since he does not dwell solely on Christian terms and words but includes Hindu, Jewish, and Muslim entries. This glossary is useful for general information, of course, but does not materially advance his arguments. Still, it is a fine addition to the book.

This book is a must read for people wanting to know what happened to religion in America and how to redress the past errors in consideration of religion as well as how to get it back into our schools where it belongs, a goal that has important consequences for every citizen.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

There's a NEW Mrs. bin Laden!

Here's a fun story...

Bin Laden's son ties the knot
By Associated Press

LONDON — Omar bin Laden, the al-Qaida leader's fourth son, has married a British woman he met in Egypt last fall, British media and colleagues of the bride said today.

Jane Felix-Browne, 51, of Moulton-Cheshire, in northwest England, was in Egypt for medical treatment of multiple sclerosis, the Times and Sun newspapers reported. She told the newpapers she met bin Laden, 27, while riding a horse near Egypt's Great Pyramid.


Great.

But this leaves me with one burning question.

Where is the bride registered at... Target?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

L.A.Times: Democrats Need to be MORE Emotional Campaigners?

-By Warner Todd Huston

This one is a hoot. The L.A.Times has posted a piece in their politics section about the supposed revelations of Drew Westen, a psychologist who is advising Democrats that they are too logical and rely on "facts" too much in their campaigns. Westen is warning Democrats that they need to be more "emotional" in their appeals to the voters because, according to his "research", Democrat and independent voters are just too darn stupid to understand logic and facts. And Westen makes this claim as if Democrats don't already campaign almost strictly on pure emotion with little appeal to intellect now!

WASHINGTON — Drew Westen, a genial 48-year-old psychologist and brain researcher, was talking to a rapt liberal audience about the role of emotion in politics, how to talk back aggressively to Republicans, and why going negative is not to be feared.

One wonders when, exactly, Democrats didn't follow this path toward using overly emotional campaign methods? Have we so soon forgotten the James Byrd ad where then Governor Bush was accused of agreeing with the racist dragging death of a black Texas man? How about LBJ's famous Daisy ad where Democrats accused Barry Goldwater of wanting to start a nuclear war? How about today where John Edwards is campaigning on "two America's" or his 2004 claims that Democrats would make sure the crippled could walk if America elected he and John Kerry to office? And how often are Republicans cast by Democrats as those evil people who want to poison the water, keep blacks from voting, take away women's rights, and starve the children?

...only EVERY election!

Yet, here is the L.A.Times trying to convince us that it is the Democrats who are just too darn logical, even tempered and fact based in their campaigning for their own good! And their new "rock star" professor Westen is happy to give them what they want.

Westen writes that it doesn't make sense to argue an issue using facts and figures and to count on voters -- particularly the swing voters who decide national elections -- to make choices based on sophisticated understandings of policy differences or procedures. He says Democratic candidates must learn to do what Republicans have understood for many years -- they must appeal to emotions. And (talking to you, Mr. Gore) stay away from numbing statistics.

The Times' article presents this "academic" Westen as a "rock star" professor for his idea and his appearance at the recent far left "Take Back America" convention where he spoke about his turn away from facts for an appeal to emotions. He has even appeared in the homes of the denizens of Hollywood and anti-American George Sorros' lair. So, he is for sure a hit with the activist, left wing, jet set.

But it is amusing that neither the extremists at the "Take Back America" conference, nor the supposed intellectuals at American Prospect Magazine, nor Westen's academic colleagues have noticed that this so-called professor's ideas are actually anti-intellectualism at its most obvious.

This man is advocating to jettison facts and serious debate and for them to be replaced by naked emotionalism. Not very "academic" of him, is it?

Worse, this whole episode shows how little the left respects the American people. I repeat a key part of the Times' piece:

...it doesn't make sense to argue an issue using facts and figures and to count on voters ... to make choices based on sophisticated understandings...

In essence they are saying that people are too stupid to understand how smart and sophisticated their betters on the left are, so ginning up the voters' emotions is the only way to win. Amazing for its arrogance, isn't it?

But, overt emotionalism and arrogance has been the left's calling card since Marxism's birth. So, it's no wonder that they love this anti-intellectual "academic." After all, he's telling them exactly what they want to hear to "validate" their "feelings."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive